Skip to Content

News & Insights

James F. Haley, Jr. Recognized by 2019 Who’s Who Legal: Patents

Founding Partner at Haley Guiliano LLP, James F. Haley, Jr. was recognized as a leading patent practitioner, by 2019 Who’s Who Legal: Patents.

READ MORE
Haley Guiliano Joins 3,000 Others at the NYIPLA Judges’ Dinner

Haley Guiliano LLP hosted clients and many former and present colleagues at the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (NYIPLA) 97th Annual Dinner in Honor of the Federal Judiciary.

READ MORE
Keys To Successful AI Patents in the U.S. And Europe

Check out Drew Schulte’s latest Law360 article on how to successfully file AI patents in the Europe and the United States.

READ MORE
James Haley Co-Authors 2nd Edition of the Global Law & Business

James F. Haley, Jr. co-authored the U.S. chapter of International Patent Litigation: Developing an Effective Strategy, Second Edition, Global Law and Business (2018).

READ MORE
Haley Guiliano LLP Ranked in Top 5 in Alice Wins

Haley Guiliano LLP ranked among top five law firms with the best Alice allowance rate.

READ MORE
IP Shutdown

You’re just a patent attorney – why should you care about the Government shutdown? Find out from Jeff Ingerman.

READ MORE
Haley Guiliano Recognized for #1 PTAB Practice Development of 2018

Haley Guiliano’s Patent Owner win in IPR2018-00752 has been recognized in #1 PTAB development of 2018, by the Patents Post Grant.

READ MORE
Coordinating Patent Strategies Across PTAB And EPO

Check out Drew Schulte’s latest Law 360 article, an expert analysis on coordinating patent strategies across PTAB and EPO.

READ MORE
Haley Guiliano LLP Ranked as 2019 Best Law Firms

Haley Guiliano LLP is proud to announce that we are ranked by US News Lawyer Directory powered by Best Lawyers®.

READ MORE
Another Patent Owner Victory at the PTAB for Haley Guiliano LLP

The PTAB declined to institute Inter Partes Review on U.S. Patent No. 6,183,841 in NHK Spring Co., Ltd. v. Intri-Plex Techs., Inc., IPR2018-00752. The PTAB agreed under 325(d) that the same prior art from prosecution was merely repackaged for the IPR and also considered the relative progress of a co-pending District Court case under 314(a).

READ MORE